Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Baranj Coal Mines Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Baranj Coal Mines Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)

In the subject case, we find that the applicant (supplier of service) and KPCL (recipient of service) are not related persons and price is the sole consideration for the supply.

Further, from Article 6.1.3 and Article 29.1.2 of the Mining Agreement it is clear that the amounts towards Royalty, MMDR, DMF Fund and Reserve Price are payable by KPCL directly to Government of Maharashtra and which is being paid accordingly by KPCL. <

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31