The complex nature of India’s GST—which has four tax brackets ranging from a 5% to 28%—is bound to attract thousands of lawsuits in a legal system already grappling with a backlog of more than 24 million cases. Even before the planned 1 July roll out, about 100,000 indirect tax appeals were clogging India’s judicial system at the end of March 2015, locking away some $23 billion in potential government revenue, according to a government report.
This article analyses the impact of new tax regime on the community which is critical for delivering justice from the courts i.e. Advocates.
Scope of GST on Advocates
The common notion exists in the market that Lawyer is outside the purview of GST. However, this is false perception after analyzing the provision in a detailed manner. Services provided by an advocate are taxable under GST.
As per Notification No. 12/2017 (Central Tax- Rate) dated 28th June 2017, the following services of advocates are exempted:
(1) Services by firm of advocates / an individual advocate other than a senior advocate, by way of legal services to-
(2) Services by a senior advocate by way of legal services to-
Chargeability of GST in following cases:-
Reverse Charge Mechanism
In the case of a Reverse charge, the recipient is liable to pay service tax. Service tax is paid and deposited by service receiver to the government. Under Section 9(3) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 the Government, through a gazette notification, specifies categories of supply of goods or services or both, on which tax shall be paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient of such goods or services or both.
Reverse Charge Mechanism provided in legal services as per Notification No. 13/2017 (Central Tax – Rate) dated 28th June 2017, by which the liability to pay GST is fixed on the recipient of services in the case of following situations:
Services supplied by an individual advocate including a senior advocate by way of representational services before any court, tribunal or authority, directly or indirectly, to any business entity located in the taxable territory, including where contract for provision of such service has been entered through another advocate or a firm of advocates, or
Services supplied by a firm of advocates by way of legal services, to a business entity located in a taxable territory.
Prior to the clarification the Position regarding the applicability of GST on Legal Services provided by individual Advocates including Senior Advocates and a Firm of Advocates was interpreted in the following manner:-
When an individual Advocate/Senior Advocate providing services other than representational services to a business entity with a turnover of Rs. 20 Lakhs or above in the previous financial year, they will have to collect and pay GST.
But, if the business entity is not situated in the taxable territory (means a foreign client other than an individual), all legal practitioners including an individual advocate, a senior advocate or a firm of advocates will be liable to collect and pay GST.
A firm of advocates is outside the purview of GST, as the whole of their legal services are under Reverse Charge, provided they are not providing any services to a business entity outside taxable territory.
Services like a retainer, legal opinion, trademark services, documentation, drafting, etc will be covered under GST, in the case of individual advocates and Senior Advocates.
Clarification on 15th July 2017 from Ministry of Finance
It is further clarified that legal service has been defined to mean any service provided in relation to advice, consultancy or assistance in any branch of law, in any manner and includes representational services before any court, tribunal or authority.
It is further clarified that notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 (Serial No. 2)specifies, inter alia,the following service under reverse charge mechanism,- “Services supplied by an individual advocate including a senior advocate by way of representational services before any court, tribunal or authority, directly or indirectly, to any business entity located in the taxable territory, including where contract for provision of such service has been entered through another advocate or a firm of advocates, or by a firm of advocates, by way of legal services, to a business entity.”
The words “by way of legal services” are preceded and succeeded by a comma. Therefore, the said words apply to an individual advocate including a senior advocate and a firm of advocates. Legal services provided by either of them are liable for payment of GST under reverse charge by the business entity.
The words “by way of representational services before any court, tribunal or authority….” appear in conjunction with senior advocate without a comma and merely describe the nature and mode of representational services provided by a senior advocate to a business entity. It, therefore, follows that legal services, which includes representational services, provided by advocates are under reverse charge.
Rationale for above clarification:-
Recent Case Law : JK Mittal Company VS Union Of India & Others (Delhi High Court)
The case was brought to the court after a petition by JK Mittal, owner of JK Mittal and Company, a Delhi-based law firm with clients in various courts and tribunals in India. The petitioner contested that the notification issued by the central government and the Delhi government to pay taxes on all services offered by them was in violation with the provisions of the CGST Act and the DGST Act read with Article 279A of the Constitution of India and has negative consequences on the legal fraternity.
The petitioner stated that such a notification was completely contrary to the recommendation made by the GST Council that it was the receiver of the services who would be responsible for paying the taxes and not the law firm. The petitioner had also raised that lawyers registered under the Finance Act must be exempted from such a requirement under the new law.
The Court is hearing a Petition filed by J.K. Mittal & Company, which has challenged notifications issued by the Centre and Delhi Government, wherein it was prescribed that advocates and law firms would pay the tax on all services offered by them. Only representational services were made an exception, dictating that it would be the clients who would pay the tax for such services.
Asking the authorities to clarify, the Court held that till such clarification is provided to the Court, no coercive action to be taken against lawyers or law-firms for not complying with any legal requirement under the CGST Act, the IGST Act or the DGST Act.
Therefore, until final hearing of this case, there will be no GST registration for lawyers and law firms for any legal service. The Court has directed that the case be next listed on July 18, 2017
Erstwhile provision in Service Tax
In the erstwhile Service Tax Law, as per Notification No. 30/2012-Service Tax dated 20th June, 2012, the whole of legal services were under Reverse Charge for all advocates. But in GST law, representational services only are brought in Reverse Charge, in the case of Individual advocate and Senior Advocate.
But After the clarification from the government, It may be mentioned that there is no change made in the taxation of legal services in the GST era.
Registration Requirement in GST
Section 22 of the Central GST Act, 2017, says that:
22 (1) Every supplier shall be liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory, other than special category States, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees:
Provided that where such person makes taxable supplies of goods or services or both from any of the special category States. So if the aggregate turnover of an advocate is more than Rs. 20 Lakhs/Rs. 10 Lakhs, he will have to take registration under GST Law.
Since Reverse charge is applicable on entire advocate Fraternity so only senior advocate is required to get registration under GST when Senior Advocate provides any legal services to another advocate or firm of advocates.
Contentious issue with Regard to Registration
Section 22 (2) implies that Every person who, on the day immediately preceding the appointed day, is registered or holds a license under an existing law, shall be liable to be registered under this Act with effect from the appointed day.
Legal services were governed by the reverse charge mechanism from 2012 and no mechanism was provided to cancel the registration taken by legal firm prior Reverse Tax Service Regime.
Registration under the Finance Act 1994 under Service Tax continued of many legal firms and practitioners, by virtue of Section 22 (2) of the CGST Act they are indirectly under an obligation to get registered under the CGST Act and thereby be subject to a whole series of legal obligations including having to pay tax on reverse charge basis under Section 9 (4) of the CGST Act and DGST Act and Section 5(4) of the IGST Act.
The legal profession is perceived to be imbued with such nobility so as to occupy a pedestal above a mere profession or economic activity and the indirect tax laws applicable to the provision of services used to reflect the aforesaid perception, at least in India. It gives an impression that government turns paranoid while dealing Lawyers in tax matters. The astonishing fact is attempt is being made to tap and boost tax collection in unorganized and ill tech sector while Lawyer coming from such affluent class of the society is being kept of GST.