Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : BMW India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for the State of Haryana and another (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : CWP-7235-2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/11/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

BMW India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for the State of Haryana and another (Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Summary: In the case of BMW India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for the State of Haryana and another, the Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the availability of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for demo vehicles. The Court referred to Circular No. 231/25/2024-GST dated September 10, 2024, issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), which clarified that demo vehicles used by authorized dealers to promote vehicle sales and capitalized in their accounts qualify as “capital goods” under Section 2(19) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. Such vehicles are deemed to be used in the course or furtherance of business, making ITC available under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act. However, the ITC is subject to specific conditions, such as the restriction under Section 16(3) that disallows ITC if depreciation is claimed on the tax component under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Haryana Government adopted a similar stance through Circular No. 231/25-HGST/2024/GST-II dated September 13, 2024. The Court noted that earlier observations denying ITC for demo vehicles were inconsistent with these clarifications. Consequently, it set aside the denial of ITC and directed that the petitioner, BMW India Pvt. Ltd., be entitled to ITC as per the conditions outlined in the circulars. This judgment underscores the importance of consistent interpretation of GST provisions and reinforces the entitlement to ITC for capitalized demo vehicles when used in business activities.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

A clarification of availability of Input Tax Credit in respect of demo vehicles, has been issued vide Circular No.231/25/2024-GST (F.NO.CBIC-20001/6/2024-GST], dated 10.09.2024, wherein, it has been held as under:-

5.Availability of input tax credit on demo vehicles in cases where such vehicles are capitalized in the books of account by the authorized dealers.

5.1 As per provisions of section 16(1) of CGST Act, every registered taxpayer is entitled to take input tax credit charged on any supply of goods and services made to him, where such goods or services are used in the course or furtherance of business of such person, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed and in the manner which is specified.

5.2 Further, “goods” has been defined in section 2(52) of CGST Act, as, “goods” means every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply.

5.3 Also, section 2(19) of CGST Act defines “capital goods” as, “capital goods” means goods, the value of which is capitalized in the books of account of the person claiming the input tax credit and which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business.

5.4 As mentioned in paras above, as the demo vehicles are used by the authorized dealers to promote further sale of motor vehicles of the similar type and therefore, such vehicles appear to be used in the course or furtherance of business of the authorized dealers. Where such vehicles are capitalized in the books of accounts by the authorized dealer, the said vehicle falls in the definition of “capital goods” under section 2(19) of CGST Act. As per provision of section 16(1) of CGST Act, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed, a recipient of goods is entitled to take input tax credit in respect of tax charged on the inward supply of any goods, which as per definition of “goods” under section 2(52) of CGST Act, includes even capital goods. Further, section 2(19) of CGST Act also recognizes that capital goods are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business. Accordingly, availability of input tax credit on demo vehicles is not affected by way of capitalization of such vehicles in the books of account of the authorized dealers, subject to other provisions of the Act.

5.5 However, it is to be mentioned that in case of capitalization of demo vehicles, availability of input tax credit would be subject to provisions of section 16(3) of CGST Act, which provides that where the registered person has claimed depreciation on the tax component of the cost of capital goods and plant and machinery under the Income-tax Act, 1961, the input tax credit on the said tax component shall not be allowed. It is further mentioned that in case demo vehicle, which is capitalized, is subsequently sold by the authorized dealer, the authorized dealer shall have to pay an amount or tax as per provisions of section 18(6) of CGST Act read with rule 44(6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017.”

2. The said clarification has been also taken note of by the Haryana Government, and they have issued similar clarification vide Circular No.231/25-HGST/2024/GST-II (CBIC Circlar No.231/25/2024-GST, dated 11.09.2024), dated 13th September 2024.

3. Said circular discussed the availability of Input Tax Credit on demo vehicles, which are motor vehicles for transportation of passengers having approved seating capacity of not more than 13 persons in terms of clause(a) of section 17(5) of Haryana Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.

Further, it deals with the availability of the Input Tax Credit on demo vehicles in cases where such vehicles are capitalized in the books of account by the authorized dealers.

The circular dated 13th September 2024 and the circular dated 10th September 2024, are taken on record.

4. Keeping in view thereto, the order impugned in the present writ petition dated 28th June 2021, whereby, the appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 101 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Haryana Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017, would not be sustainable.

5. The observations of not giving benefit of Input Tax Credit to vehicles, which have been initially used as demo vehicles, is accordingly, set-aside in view of the extension of grant of availability of Input Tax Credit with respect to the demo vehicles, as clarified by the aforesaid circulars.

The order dated 09.10.2018 is, therefore, set-aside accordingly, and the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of ITC in the aforesaid terms, with consequent actions to follow.

Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Legal Heir’s Challenge to Tax Recovery: Gujarat HC Ruling Supreme Court Ruling on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and PFBs Bank Account Freezing by Customs Authorities Quashed: Rajasthan HC Ruling Punjab & Haryana HC on GST Fraud: IPC & CGST Act Prosecution High Court Allows GST Appeals Filed Beyond Limitation View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930