Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sh. Paval Antony Vs M/s Shree Mahalakshmi Enterprises (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sh. Paval Antony Vs M/s Shree Mahalakshmi Enterprises (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

During the pre-GST period from April. 2016 to June, 2017 the Respondent was paying tax @ 6% which was increased to 18% during the post-GST period and hence there was increase in the rate of tax and therefore, the Respondent is not liable to pay the benefit of tax reduction to his customers. However, the Respondent has availed CENVAT credit on the Service Tax during the pre-GST period from April, 2016 to June, 2017 amounting to Rs. 4,

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31