Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Goutam Bhowmik Vs State of West Bengal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri)
Appeal Number : MAT 205 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/01/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Goutam Bhowmik Vs State of West Bengal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri)

Introduction: In a recent legal development, Goutam Bhowmik secured a significant victory against the State of West Bengal, as the Calcutta High Court set aside an unjust tax assessment order dated 25.03.2021. The appellant, engaged in the trade of Timber, had filed a writ petition, WPA 1866 of 2023, challenging the order passed under Section 73 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017, for the tax period spanning April 2018 to March 2019.

Background: The appellant contended that the assessment order was flawed as it was issued without affording him the required opportunity of hearing, as mandated by Section 75(4) of the Act. The legal battle unfolded with the appellant, represented by Advocate Sri Himangshu Kumar Ray, alleging a breach of statutory provisions and principles of natural justice. On the other side, Mr. Subir Kumar Saha, learned AGP, and Mr. Dilip Kumar Agarwal, representing the State, argued that the proper officer had issued a notice under Section 73 and the appellant had failed to respond, making the order legitimate.

Court’s Analysis: After hearing both parties, the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, comprising [Judge Names], meticulously examined the case. The court noted that the show cause notice, though indicating an opportunity for a personal hearing, failed to specify the date, time, or venue for the same. This omission, the court held, amounted to a violation of Section 75(4) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017.

Quoting the Allahabad High Court’s decision in Bharat Mint and Allied Chemicals vs. Commissioner of Commercial-tax, the Calcutta High Court emphasized that the opportunity of a personal hearing is mandatory when an adverse decision is contemplated against the assessee. The Allahabad High Court’s ruling supported the notion that the absence of a specified date, time, or venue for personal hearing in the notice renders the order unsustainable.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031