Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maa Amba Builders & Anr. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : WPA 842 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/05/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Maa Amba Builders & Anr. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue (Calcutta High Court)

The case of Maa Amba Builders & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, heard in the Calcutta High Court, revolves around the expiration of a waybill and subsequent penalty imposition under tax laws. The petitioners contested the penalty, asserting their lack of intent to evade taxes despite the expired waybill.

The petitioners, engaged in business transactions, faced interception of goods due to an expired e-way bill. Despite timely issuance of tax invoices and attempts to extend the waybill’s validity, the goods were detained, and a penalty was imposed under Section 129(3) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The crux of the petitioners’ argument lies in their contention that the expiration of the waybill was inadvertent and not indicative of tax evasion. They cite precedents and legal provisions emphasizing that mere expiration of the waybill does not imply deliberate tax evasion.

The appellate authority upheld the penalty, disregarding the absence of evidence suggesting tax evasion. However, the petitioners challenge this decision, highlighting the appellate authority’s failure to consider their defense adequately.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031