Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 396 Results

Any clause in any agreement/ Article of Association restricting free transferability of shares of public companies is void and non- enforceable

Case Name : Western Maharashtra Development Corporation. Ltd Vs. Bajaj Auto Limited (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : MANU/MH/0109/2010
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Bombay High Court (1878)

Words "any other law for the time being in force" in section 100A of CPC shall also cover appeal u/s 483 of Companies Act

Case Name : UP Cement Vetanbhogi Sahkari Rin Samiti Ltd. Vs Official Liquidator (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Appeal No. 1748 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/12/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Allahabad High Court (800)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

A shareholder has no "say" in management of a company unless and until he becomes part of management

Case Name : Ravi Raj Gupta Vs Hans Raj Gupta & Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : C. S.(OS) No. 1944 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/02/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Delhi High Court (3365)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

CLB cannot exercise its inherent powers to pass orders without jurisdiction

Case Name : Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. Vs R. K. Dhall (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Company Appeal No. 45 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/09/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Bombay High Court (1878)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Status of private limited company if shareholders exceed 50 and importance of records of ROC

Case Name : Ram Parshottam Mittal Vs Hillcrest Realty Sdn. Bhd.SLP (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : (Civil) Nos. 1069-1071 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Non confirmation of minutes does not have any effect on the decision taken at the earlier meeting: SC

Case Name : Kerala State Electricity Board Vs Hindustan Construction Co. Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : [2009] 91 SCL 183 (SC)
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Provisions u/s 22 of SICA not applicable to arbitration proceedings

Case Name : Kwality Spinning Mills Ltd. & Anr. Vs. India Cements Capital Finance Ltd. & Anr. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : (2008) 145 Comp. Cas 288 (Mad)]
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/06/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Madras High Court (1750)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Sum due u/s 434 of the Companies Act, must mean what has fructified and can not merely be a contingent liability or deferred payment

Case Name : Priyaraj Electronics Ltd. Vs Motorola India (P.) Ltd. (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : C.A. No. 124-127 of 2006 and C.P. No. 17 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/04/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Punjab and Haryana HC (456)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Dues of Petitioning creditor relating to period beyond scheme under implementation by Board and not forming part of scheme, bar u/s. 22(1) of SICA does not apply

Case Name : Kothari Metals Ltd. Vs. Indian steel & Wire Products Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : (2008) 145 Comp. Cas 504 (Cal)
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Calcutta High Court (838)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

On refusal by company to register transfer of shares appeal lies only to CLB and Civil Court has no jurisdiction

Case Name : Arvind Porwal & Ors. Vs. Bharat Kumar Pandya & Anr. (MP High Court)
Appeal Number : (2008) 145 Comp Cas 302 (MP)
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Madhya Pradesh HC (176)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031