The issue under consideration is whether seizure of the cash amount to the tune of Rs 66 lakhs by Senior Intelligence Officer at the time of Search Operation is justified in law?...

MP HC grants Bail against GST offence u/s 132(1) of CGST Act...

MP HC Grant Bail to Pakistani National accused of GST evasion...

MP High Court Grant Bail to Pakistani National who accused of GST evasion of Rs. 225 Crores alongwith furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,00,000/-...

Ankit Babeley Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Petitioner was unable to file Trans-1 within permissible time and requested to allow the petitioner to file the same so as to enable him to claim transitional credit of eligible duties in respect of inputs held in stock on the appointed day in […]...

The issue under consideration is whether person is entitled to continue at the same place where he was posted at the time of passing the suspension order and committing the alleged misconduct?...

Subhash Joshi & another Vs Director General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) & Ors. (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Submission of counsel for petitioner is that the search should be carried out in the presence of the Advocate, but counsel for petitioner has failed to point out any statutory provision or any such legal right in favour [&hell...

Bhupendra Suryawanshi Vs Sai Traders (Madhya Pradesh) The proviso to Section 138, however, is all important and stipulates three distinct conditions precedent, which must be satisfied before the dishonour of a cheque can constitute an offence and become punishable. The first condition is that the cheque ought to have been presented to the...

In the present case, respondent rejected the refund of excess amount of stamp duty paid on the ground that the said provision does not apply to the case of the petitioner/company as ad-valorem duty was paid at 1% and not at 5% of the market value....

Lakhan Singh Chauhan and Company Vs Union of India and others (Madhya Pradesh HC) In the impugned order, there is no consideration to the grounds mentioned in the memo of appeal regarding non-communication of the order to the petitioner and start of period of limitation from the date of communication or knowledge of the order. […]...