Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Filter Judiciary

Found 22499 Results

Revision- A possible view not unsustainable in law cannot be revised

Case Name : Grasim Industries Ltd. Vs CIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Reference No. 113 of 1990
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/02/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Incorrect assumption of facts, or incorrect application of law can only satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous

Case Name : Regency Park Property Management Services (P) Ltd. Vs. CIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : 01/01/2010
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)

Block assessment has to be based on evidences and not best judgment

Case Name : Cit Vs. R.M.L. Mehrotra (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : 02/09/2009
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Allahabad High Court (800)

One Bench cannot differ from the view of another co-ordinate bench but must refer to a larger Bench

Case Name : Mercedes Benz India Private Limited. Vs Union of India and others (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 1614 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Activity of ‘assembling’ amounts to manufacturing for relief u/s 80IB, employment of temporary workers enough to claim relief

Case Name : Chiranjjeevi Wind Energy Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : 30/03/2010
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Chennai (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Making unsustainable claims do not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars and Penalty u/s. 271 (1) (c) cannot be imposed

Case Name : C.I.T. Vs Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : (2010) 11 SCC 762, (2010) 322 ITR 158
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

The obligation to deduct the TDS u/s 195 (1) arises only when the payment is chargeable to tax

Case Name : Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd. Vs CIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 439 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

India-Mauritius treaty benefits cannot be denied on the ground that assessee is a subsidiary of a USA Corp

Case Name : E. Trade Mauritius Ltd. (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No.826 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/032010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No capital gains on intra-group transfer of shares in an Indian company for no consideration: AAR

Case Name : Amiantit International Holding Ltd. (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : 2010-TIOL-07- ARA-IT
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)

Discount retained by distributors of SIM cards and recharge coupons liable for TDS

Case Name : Idea Cellular Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : 2010-TIOL-139-HC-DEL-IT
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031