Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

TRO can sell the right, title and interest of the defaulter assessee and nothing more, If the said right, title and interest is hedged with the conditions or fetters, the sale will be made subject to the said condition/fetters

Case Name : The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs M/s Mono flex India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Letters Patent Appeal No. 842 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Payment for software cannot be treated as a payment for ‘process’ liable to be taxed as royalty – ITAT Mumbai

Case Name : ADIT Vs TII Team Telecom International Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3939/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/08/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Lack of good faith and due diligence cannot be inferred when the grounds on which ALP determined by the assessee has been rejected are reasonably debatable

Case Name : DCIT Vs RBS Equities India Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2570/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/08/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2004- 05
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

For interest under Section 244A(1)(b) of the Act the relevant date is the date of payment of tax and not the date on which the amount of tax collected is credited to the account of the Central Government

Case Name : The Income Tax Commissioner- LTU Vs M/S Asian Paints Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 4994 Of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Notice not complying with Mandatory period of time specified U/s. 158BC is invalid

Case Name : Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Micro Labs Ltd. (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T. Appeal No. 2303, 2784, 3060 & 3148 OF 2005 and 749 OF 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Karnataka High Court (635)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Compensation to be awarded should not be measured by the nature, location or degree of the injury, but rather by the extent or degree of the incapacity resulting from the injury – SC

Case Name : Sri Ramachandrappa Vs The Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : 09/08/2011
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Disallowance u/s. 40A(9) for Statutory Corporations cannot be made as their Service Regulations have ‘force of law’ – ITAT Pune

Case Name : Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 382/PN/07
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/08/2011
Related Assessment Year : 23/08/2011
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessee entitled to claim deduction in respect of the provision for warranty made on the basis of past experience

Case Name : Acer India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 784/Bang/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/02/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2005- 06
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Bangalore (1081)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Un-quantified and disputed ratable value as determined by Municipal Corporation can be termed as crystallised liability and can be claimed as deduction

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs DCM Limited (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITR No. 66/1995
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Ad hoc disallowance of foreign tour expenditure not sustainable without questioning the business purpose of the trip

Case Name : Amit Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A Nos. 1673 & 1674/Kol/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07 
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Kolkata (1035)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031