Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22494 Results

Matter not raised before tribunal cannot be raised before High Court

Case Name : M/s Maken Cement Industries Vs CIT (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax (Appeal) No. 94 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Punjab and Haryana HC (457)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Amounts already paid without TDS cannot be disallowed- Merilyn Shipping followed

Case Name : Jitendra Mansukhlal Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA NO.2293/MUM/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/03/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 40(a)(ia) not attracted in respect of payment already made by the end of previous year

Case Name : M/s. Vivil Exports P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.509/Mum/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/02/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

s. 40(a)(ia) Disallowance has to be made irrespective the fact that whether payment is made during the year or not

Case Name : ITO Vs Pratibhuti Viniyog Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.1689/Mum/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/08/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed for failure to deduct TDS

Case Name : Rushi Builders and Developers Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 6684/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/03/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Burden of proof lies on revenue that assessee stated a lesser amount in return to evade tax

Case Name : commissioner of Income Tax, Guwahati & Vs M/s. Sati Oil Udyog Ltd. & ANR. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal nos.91 33-91 34 OF 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/03/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not justified for unsustainable claim which was fully disclosed

Case Name : CIT Vs S. M. Construction (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 412 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/03/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Whether provisions of Section 206AA overrides provisions of Section 90(2) of Income-tax Act, 1961

Case Name : Dy. Director of Income-tax Vs Serum Institute of India Limited (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1601 to 1604/PN/2014
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Addition for Bogus Purchases based on mere Assumptions not justified

Case Name : Shri Ganpatraj A Sanghavi Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2826/Mum/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/11/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

AO can not treat purchase as Bogus merely because Supplier is declared Hawala dealer by Sales tax Department

Case Name : Ramesh Kumar & Co Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.2959/Mum/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/11/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031