Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Filter Judiciary

Found 22494 Results

Any tax/duty paid in later year can be capitalized in the year in which obligation to pay arose

Case Name : CIT Vs Noida Medicare Centre Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number :  ITA 529/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/08/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Sec. 40(b)(v)- ‘Allocable profit’ means book profit before partner’s remuneration: HC

Case Name : CIT Vs Vaish Associates (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number :  ITA 50/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/08/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Addition based on third party evidence not tenable if no evidence found from assessee

Case Name : Shri Vinit Ranawat Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 1105 and 1106/PN/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07 & 2007-08
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessment order liable to set aside, if JCIT approval is without application of mind

Case Name : Smt. Shreelekha Damani, Vs The DCIT (OSD-1)CR-7 (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal no 4061/mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/08/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

CIT cannot revoke section 263 when AO adopts one view out of two possible views : HC

Case Name : M/s Vijay Udhyog  Vs CIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : IT reference No. 19 of 1993
Date of Judgement/Order :  09/04/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Deduction u/s 54EC allowable on investment after six months if bonds were not available

Case Name : ACIT Nagpur Vs Shri Kamlakar Moghe (Bombay High Court, Nagpur)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 104 OF 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/09/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Specially designed ponds for rearing of prawns can be treated as a Plant

Case Name : Victory Aqua Farm Ltd Vs ACIT (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos 4429 and 4430 of 2006 & 5099-5100 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/09/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Photocopy of a document is acceptable evidence in income tax assessment proceedings

Case Name : Vikrant Dutt Chaudhary Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 25/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/09/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Punjab and Haryana HC (457)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Delhi HC dismisses ITR/TAR Due Date Extension Appeal

Case Name : Avinash Gupta & ANR Vs Union of India & ORS. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 8771/2015 & CMs No. 19409/2015 & 19410/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/09/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Delhi High Court (3377)

Reopening not permissible beyond four years if no failure on full disclosure

Case Name : United Shippers Ltd. Vs UOI (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : WP no. 2331/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/01/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031