This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Tribunal doesn’t have jurisdiction to prescribe rate of interest for refund
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jalan Castings Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Allahabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Jalan Castings Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad)
CESTAT Allahabad held that tribunal has no jurisdiction to prescribe the rate of interest which is prescribed by the Government of India in terms of Notification issue under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Facts- The appellant has opted to carry out his operations in terms of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as inserted by the Finance Act, 1997 read along with the Induction Furnace Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 and Rule 96 ZO of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Undisputedly in the present ...






