Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Rastogi Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No.50394 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/02/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Amit Rastogi Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

CESTAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty under rule 25 of CER 2002 merely on the basis of statements without supporting evidences is untenable in law.

Facts- The Appellant had purchased copper scrap from the registered manufacturer – M/s. Star Delta Exim Pvt. Ltd., Khushkhera, Alwar. Thereafter, the Appellant as registered dealer, supplied the copper scrap to M/s.Continental Engines on cenvatable invoices.

In the course of investigation at the premises of M/s. Star Delta Exim Pvt., it was found that there was no plant and machinery, no electricity connection, no stock of raw materials or finished goods etc.

This appellant had claimed to have received copper scrap, being manufactured scrap from Star Delta Exim. Out of this, the appellant had sold some portion of copper scrap to Continental Engines Ltd, Bhiwadi.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031