Case Law Details
Kinjal Precious Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that exemption from special additional duty (SAD) of customs under the Notification No. 21/2012-CUS dated 17.03.2012 is not available on import of parts of articles of jewellery.
Facts- The issue involved in all the six customs appeals is as to whether gold/platinum/silver findings, which are parts of jewellery, are eligible for exemption from countervailing duty under the Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 17.03.2012, as amended from time to time, and from special additional duty of customs under the Notification No. 21/2012-CUS dated 17.03.2012.
Conclusion- An exemption notification has to be strictly construed and the burden of proving that the case falls within the parameters of the exemption clause or the exemption notification is on the assessee; and if there is any ambiguity in the notification which is subject to strict interpretation, the benefit of such ambiguity cannot be claimed by the assessee and it must be interpreted in favour of the revenue.
Similar would be the position with regard to the SAD exemption notification. Entry at serial no. 78 of Chapter heading 7113 describes the goods as articles of jewellery and not as parts of articles of jewellery. The Commissioner (Appeals) has recorded a finding that since they are different articles, an assessee cannot claim the benefit of SAD exemption notification on import of parts of articles of jewellery. The finding recorded by the Additional Commissioner and the Commissioner (Appeals), therefore, does not suffer from any legality.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
