Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rahul Chauhan Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Stay Application No. 376 of 2012 in Excise Appeal No. 367 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/08/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rahul Chauhan Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad)

We find that this appellant is neither a Director nor an employee of M/s Musk Tobacco. Further, he is not connected either as a supplier or buyer of finished goods. Only he has provided space in his residence to store the document

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031