Case Law Details
Case Name : H H Patel & Company Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
H H Patel & Company Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
CESTAT Mumbai held that confirmation of differential duty necessarily has interest liability appended to it. Accordingly, liability to pay interest on duties short-paid at the time of clearance of goods for captive consumption does not get erased.
Facts- The appellant is in the business of manufacturing ‘loose zarda’, by deploying raw materials in specific proportions to obtain batches of 3165 kg, and had been clearing the same to their branches upon discharge of duties of central excise on cost for the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

