Case Law Details
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Guwahati High Court)
Whichever way we look at this dispute, what goes to the root of the present dispute is as to at what rate the duty was liable to be paid by the assessee, i.e. whether it was a duty liable to be paid on SKO or on MS and HSD.
That is the core issue. Sub-Section (1) of Section 35G states that an appeal will not lie before the High Court but before the Supreme Court if “among other things” the matter relates to rate of duty of excise. Therefore, even if one of the many issues relate to the rate of duty, the appeal would still lie before the Hon’ble Apex Court and not before the High Court.
The dispute here in any case falls in a very limited area as to the determination of the rate of duty to be paid by the assessee. That being so, this matter lies within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Hon’ble Apex Court under Section 35L of the Act and it is an appeal which cannot be heard by this Court under Section 35G of the Act.
In view thereof, we allow the preliminary objections of the assessee and dismiss the appeal as not maintainable.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
