Duty demand by treating buyer’s premises as place of removal is unsustainable

Savita Oil Technologies Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Held that buyer’s premises cannot, in law, be a “place of removal” under Section 4. Demand duty thereon is unsustainable in law.

Facts-

The appellants are engaged in manufacture of excisable goods. During the scrutiny of their records, it was noticed that the appellants were recovering transportation/ freight from their buyers and mentioning the same separately on

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.