Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad Vs M/S Sarvotham Care Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil appeal no. 4480 OF 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/05/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case

In the case of Commissioner Of Central Excise, Hyderabad Vs. M/S Sarvotham Care Limited, it was held that wherein the shampoo having medicinal properties and the dominant use of shampoo was medicinal. By considering the essential characteristics of the product and that as it was sold only on medical prescription as a medicine for treatment of disease, it cannot be classified any other general/ordinary shampoo.

Brief Facts of the Case

Respondent herein is the manufacture of ‘Ketoconazole Shampoo’ and ‘Nizral Shampoo’ which are sold in the bottles of 50 ml and 5 ml. Dispute is about the classification of the aforesaid product for the purposes of payment of central excise duty. The respondent had filed the declaration classifying the said product under CSH 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 on the ground that it is basically a medicine. However, as per the appellant/Revenue, the appropriate classification of this product is under CSH 3305.99 as it perceives the product   as ‘preparation for use on on hair’.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031