Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Vs CCE, Jaipur – I (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA URVASHI PORWAL Brief of the Case In the case of M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Versus CCE, Jaipur – I, It was held that the Revenue could not insist the appellant to avail a particular option under Rule 6. When the appellant calculated the amount to be reversed and the compliance of conditions prescribed under Rule 6 (3) (ii) readwith Rule (3A) of Rule 6 is claimed, a demand under Rule 6 (3) for an amount equal to a percentage of the exempted goods is not sustainable. Facts of the Case The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of tractors liable to Central Excise duty. They were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930