Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Vs CCE, Jaipur – I (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA URVASHI PORWAL
Brief of the Case
In the case of M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Versus CCE, Jaipur – I, It was held that the Revenue could not insist the appellant to avail a particular option under Rule 6. When the appellant calculated the amount to be reversed and the compliance of conditions prescribed under Rule 6 (3) (ii) readwith Rule (3A) of Rule 6 is claimed, a demand under Rule 6 (3) for an amount equal to a percentage of the exempted goods is not sustainable.
Facts of the Case
The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of tractors liable to Central Excise duty. They were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

