Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Takata India Pvt. Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise  (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Takata India Pvt. Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT held that the appellant have only created a general provision for slow-moving inventory and have actually not written off the inventory from the inventory or the asset account. In actuality such provision have been made by appropriation in the profit and loss account, without writing off any amount from the assets / inventory account. Rule 3(5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules is attracted only when the provision for slow-moving inventory or wherein any specific provision to write off fully or partially has been made ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930