Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dabur India Limited Vs C.C.E & S.T.-Silvasa (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 10573 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/01/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dabur India Limited Vs C.C.E & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Appeal No. E/10573/2015 is filed by appellant – M/s. Dabur India Limited (Unit-1) against Order-in-Original No. VAP-EXCUS-000-COM-014-14-15 dated 30.12.2014 and Appeal No. E/10574/2015 is filed by appellants-M/s. Dabur India Limited (Unit-2) against Order-in-Original No. VAP-EXCUS-000-COM-015-14-15 dated 30.12.2014. The issue in both these appeals is common. Therefore, they are taken up together for disposal.

02. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants also have manufacturing units in other states of India i.e. Baddi in Himachal Pradesh, Rudrapur in Uttarakhand, Sahibabad in Uttar Pradesh, Alwar in Rajasthan and Pithmapur in Madhya Pradesh. The Units located in Baddi and Rudrapur were clearing goods under area based exemption Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003 whereas the other units of the Appellants, including the units in impugned appeals, were clearing goods on payment of Central Excise Duty at the applicable rate. The Appellants also have a corporate head office at Kaushumbi, Ghaziabad which were registered with the Central Excise & Service Tax department as Input Service Distributors (ISD in short) for distributing the Cenvat Credit of input services received at the corporate office in relation to the goods manufactured at various unit across India. Baddi Unit and Rudrapur Units of M/s. Dabur India Limited were availing area based exemption underNotification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003. It appeared to Revenue that credit of Service Tax attributable to service used in a Unit exclusively engaged in the manufacture of exempted goods was distributed by Input Service distributor, to Units which were manufacturing dutiable goods. It appeared to Revenue that under Clause (b) of Rule 7 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 M/s. Dabur India Limited (Corporate head office) was not entitled to distribute such Input Service Tax credit which was attributable to Services used in a Unit exclusively engaged in manufacture of exempted goods. Therefore, investigations were carried out and on the basis of investigation a show cause notice dated 21-10-2011 was issued to M/s. Dabur India Limited (Input Service Distributor – Ghaziabad). It was alleged in the said show cause notice that Advertisement Service & Sales Promotion Services received by Input Service Distributor which was attributable to exempted goods and traded goods were distributed to the Units which were manufacturing dutiable final product. It appeared to Revenue that Cenvat credit on account of exempted goods and traded goods were inadmissible for distribution since the said credit was in respect of input services which were attributable to exempted goods. Therefore, Appellants were called upon to show cause Notices as to why Cenvat credit attributable to exempted goods and trading goods should not be disallowed. The said show cause notices was adjudicated through the above impugned Orders-in-Original. Aggrieved by the said impugned orders, appellants are before this Tribunal.

03. Shri B.L.Narsimhan, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that dispute regarding the eligibility of credit by the ISD unit & Sahibabad unit of M/s Dabur India has been settled by the Hon’ble Tribunal vide Final Order No. A/70452-53/2017 dated 13.04.2017. The Hon’ble CESTAT has set aside the entire demand raised against the ISD unit. Thus, the entire Cenvat Credit availed by the ISD on disputed input services has held to be eligible, including the credit sought to be denied in the impugned orders from the Appellants. Once the availment and distribution of credit by the ISD is held to be proper, there is no question of denying the same credit at the hands of the recipient units on the same grounds and for the same period. In the same Order dated 13.04.2017 the Hon’ble CESTAT, has also set aside the demand for denial of Credit raised against the Sahibabad unit of the Appellants on identical grounds as the show cause notice in the present case.

3.1 He also submits that in pursuance of the Judgment dated 13.04.2017 of the Hon’ble CESTAT, Allahabad, the Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi vide order dated 24.07.2017 has set aside the demand for denial of credit raised against the Alwar Unit and demand for denial of credit raised against the Pithampur unit.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031