Cenvat reversal on inputs cleared as such FIFO system to be followed

Wimplast Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmadabad)

In this case demand was made by the Revenue of differential Cenvat amount, considering the inputs removed as such is out of the current purchase, therefore, there is difference of duty. However, on perusal of the running stock account, I find that the quantity removed from time to time was carried forward from the old stock and the stock balance of the input was much more than the quantity cleared by the appellant. Therefore, if FIFO system is applied then the removal of input must be considered from

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.