Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs Bajrang Ingole (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 75026 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/11/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs Vs Bajrang Ingole (CESTAT Kolkata)

CESTAT Kolkata held that impugned gold cannot be seized u/s 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 as it is a case of town seizure and revenue has failed to prove that gold in question is smuggled one. Accordingly, gold not liable for confiscation.

Facts-

Based upon specific information, the officers intercepted the respondent No.1 on 12.12.2018 along with 1 kg Gold Bar valued at Rs.30,50,000/- and one small size pocket diary being seized from his personal possession vide seizure case dated 12.12.2018.

The so seized gold was examined by M/s.A.B. Kundu Jewellers, an approved valuer, who issued certificate that the recovered yellow metal is made of 24 Karat Gold weighting 1000.000 Grams valued at Rs.30,50,000/- at the prevailing rate on 12.12.2018.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031