Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hyundai Transys India Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (Imports) (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hyundai Transys India Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (Imports) (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that the classification of the goods cannot be said to be one involving suppression of facts and willful mis-statement. Hence, invocation of extended period of limitation under section 28(4) of Customs Act not justified. Facts- Specific intelligence gathered by the SIIB, Chennai, alleged that the appellant was importing goods namely ‘Polyurethane Sheet’ and have misclassified the same under CTI 3926 9099 and availed BCD exemption by availing FTA benefit under Notification No. 152/2009 i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930