Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Meghna Clearing and Forwarding P. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Meghna Clearing and Forwarding P. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)

In the present case the concern clerk admitted his mistake and sought for a lenient view in the matter. As per Section 58 of the Indian Evidence Act facts admitted by the parties or their agents are not required to be proved in any proceedings. In this regard in citing judicial decisions reported in 2007 (212) ELT 112 (Tri.-Bang.) in the case of A.S. Gopinath Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin learned Counsel for the Appellant had argued that

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31