Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Customs Act 1962: Telangana HC Rules Cargo Handling Regulations 2009 Ultra Vires

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 2068
Case Name
Central Board of Excise and Customs Vs GMR Hyderabad International Airport Limited (Telangana High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Central Board of Excise and Customs Vs GMR Hyderabad International Airport Limited (Telangana High Court)

The Telangana High Court ruled that the Cargo Handling Regulations of 2009, as per the Customs Act 1962, were ultra vires in the case of Central Board of Excise and Customs Vs. GMR Hyderabad International Airport Limited. The court found that the regulations lacked a legal basis to survive and deemed the levied cost recovery charges as unsustainable. This decision stemmed from a dispute regarding cost recovery charges between the years 2008 and 2013, relating to the operations at the Hyderabad International Airport. The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Customs Act 1962, particularly Sections 141 and 157, and concluded that there was no express statutory provision authorizing the imposition of such charges. The court further emphasized that the recovery charges, essentially salaries payable to customs staff, constituted a tax without statutory backing, violating constitutional principles. The ruling dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the Single Judge, asserting that the 2009 Regulations were beyond the scope of the Customs Act.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF TELANGANA HIGH COURT

This intra court appeal is filed against the order dated 11.06.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge by which the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition preferred by respondent No.1 and has inter alia held that Regulation 5(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 has no legal substratum to survive and held that consequential levy made on respondent No.1 towards cost recovery charges is wholly unsustainable. The dispute in this appeal pertains to cost recovery charges between the years 2008 and 2013. In order to appreciate the challenge of the appellants to the impugned order, the relevant facts need mention which are stated infra.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,687

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.