Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narru Guru Shantha Siva Kamal Vs Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Narru Guru Shantha Siva Kamal Vs Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that in absence of any cogent and corroborative evidence, gold in question cannot be construed to be of foreign origin or smuggled in nature. Accordingly, god seized is not liable for confiscation under section 111(b) and 111(d) of the Customs Act. 1962. Accordingly, order is set aside. Facts- The present appeal has been filed by Narru Guru Shantha Siva Kamal of Vijayawada (appellant) against the impugned Order-in-Appeal dated 30.10.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Customs(Appeals), where...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031