Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surendra Electricals Vs Principal Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 51035 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/07/20223
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Surendra Electricals Vs Principal Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)

M/s Surendra Electricals filed a bill of entry to clear imported LED lights, but upon examination, it was found that the quantity of goods was mis-declared. The Customs authorities re-assessed the bill of entry, imposed penalties, and allowed redemption of goods on payment of a fine. The appellant appealed to CESTAT Delhi challenging the penalties imposed.

The appellant argued that the order was illegal, and the excess quantity was sent by the supplier’s mistake. They also claimed that there was no intention to mis-declare. However, CESTAT upheld the penalties, considering the substantial difference in the quantity declared and found during examination.

CESTAT Delhi upheld the penalties imposed on M/s Surendra Electricals for mis-declaring the quantity of imported LED lights. The decision emphasizes the importance of accurate declarations in customs proceedings and the consequences of mis-declarations.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT DELHI ORDER

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031