Held that as per the scheme of arrangement and amalgamation, the assets situated in the state of Rajasthan and required to be assessed by the statutory scheme of the Stamp Act of 1998.
Urmila Vs Income Tax Officer (Rajasthan High Court) the very substantial point which has been raised by the petitioners that one single cash deposit of Rs.34,01,000/- has been taken as two different transactions, which according to the petitioners is factually incorrect and not borne out from any of the record including transactions made as entered […]
Rajasthan HC turned down Levy of VAT at higher rate by department on Food served in Restaurants (which obtained liquor licence as per 3 Star or above category hotels)
Abdul Majeed Vs ITO (Rajasthan High Court) High Court held that while passing an order under Section 148A of the Act, the authority is required to reach satisfaction to not only that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, but in case where three years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, […]
Shree Basant Bhandar Int Udyog Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) This bunch of writ petitions primarily involves the issue of permissibility of raising demand of GST on royalty. The petitioners in these petitions have challenged the notifications whereby, royalty paid by them on mining activity is being subjected to GST and/or notices issued […]
Vimlesh Bansal Vs Ashok Kumar (Rajasthan High Court) The legal maxim ‘Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt’ literally translates to ‘the law assists only those who are vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights’. The said legal maxim applies squarely to the present case where applicants did not take recourse of law available to […]
Kamal Chand Bothra Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arising out of F. No.DGGI/INT/INTL/668/2022/-Gr-A-O/o ADG-DGGI-JZU-JAIPUR; Registered at Directorate General Of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Jaipur Zonal Office, Jaipur relating to offence punishable under Sections 132 (1) of Central Goods and Services […]
Baker Hughes Asia Pacific Limited Vs Union Of India (Rajasthan High Court) HC held that that the circular dated 31.03.2020, being a subordinate legislation, is repugnant and conflicting to the parent legislation i.e. Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act and hence, the same cannot be applied to oust the legitimate claim for accumulated ITC refund […]
HC court is of the view that applicant-petitioner is a Chartered Accountant and not a public servant. Thus provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988Act cannot be involved against a private person alone, is a question worth consideration.
Gopi Kishan S/o Shri Chagan Lal Vs State Of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) The case of petitioner-Rani Dan, Advocate, when seen in light of the precedential backdrop, and more particularly when it is apparent on the face of the record that the role of the said petitioner, in the present case, was exercised only as […]
