Sh. Nitin Kumar Joshi Vs GK ARPL Ventures (NAA) In the instant case, there is no reduction of rate of tax during the relevant period and the only issue which is required to be decided by the Authority as to whether Respondent is required to pass on the benefit of Input Tax Credit. As mentioned […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs J.P. and Sons (NAA) NAA has observed that the Respondent, M/s J.P. and Sons was a distributor of M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. The Authority finds that M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. was investigated by the DGAP for allegations of profiteering is as much he has not passed […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA) There is no dispute with regard to the reduction of the tax in respect of subject products supplied by the Respondent with effect from 15-11-2017. The Government by Notification No 41/2017-CT (Rate) dated 14-11-2017 has reduced rates on subject products. In view of the above said […]
Sh. Sumit Mansingka Vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Respondent E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has made his detailed submissions regarding the fact that the credit of VAT for pre-GST era has been denied to him. He has also submitted copies of VAT returns and the UPVAT assessment orders for the relevant period in this regard. The […]
Vivek Gupta Vs Maheshwari Infratech Pvt Ltd (NAA) NAA held that Maheshwari Infratech Pvt Ltd has denied the benefit of ITC to the customers/flat buyers/recipients in his Project U-Faria’ in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has committed an offence under Section 171 (3A) of the above Act. […]
It was observed that in NAA’s Order No. 57/2022, Project Ruparel Orion had actually been considered for profiteering. Hence the contention of the Respondent appears to be true and therefore this project need not be analyzed again for determination of profiteering.
Karunakar Singh Vs Prasu Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd (NAA) 1. The present Report dated 29.10.2021 has been received by National Anti‑ Profiteering Authority (NAA or the Authority) from the Applicant No. 12 i.e. the DGAP after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the […]
Sh. Madhumal Panjumal Keswani Vs Panchshil Infrastructure Holding Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) In the Order No. 62/2022 dated 29.08.2022 of this Authority, after paragraph 32 and before paragraph 33, the following paragraph shall be added: 32A. The present investigation has been conducted up to 30.11.2020 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate (CC) […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Bhartiya Urban Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) 1 The present Report dated 27.11.2020 had been received from. the Director-General. of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 alleing profiteering in respect of Construction Services. The brief facts of the […]
Sh. Dhiraj Shetty Vs Bhagwati Infra (NAA) The brief facts of the present case, are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 09.10.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 alleging […]
