CCI dismisses anti-profiteering case against JKG Construction Pvt. Ltd., confirming no additional projects beyond JKG Palm Court were executed.
Read the full text of the Competition Commission of India’s decision to dismiss Anti-Profiteering proceedings against L&T Parel Project LLP.
Read the full order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) where Anti-Profiteering proceedings against New World Realty LLP are dropped. Understand the details and conclusions of the case.
Issue No. 1 addressed whether Anti-Profiteering proceedings initiated against Puma Realtors under Section 171 of the CGST Act should continue post the NCLT order dated 01.06.2021. The commission considered the NCLT’s order, which extinguished all liabilities, including passing on the benefit of ITC. Consequently, the proceedings were discontinued.
Sh. Sourav Majee Vs Bengal Peerless Housing Development Company Ltd. (NAA) The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA or Authority) finds from the above table that substantial Cenvat Credit of Rs. 7.32 crore was available to the Respondent in 2016-17 i.e during pre-GST period. The DGAP Report dated 12.11.2021 is silent on the above said amount of […]
Sh. K.G.M. Shushan Vs Praxis Home Retail Ltd. (NAA) NAA finds that the DGAP claimed that he has collected all relevant data and information including documents from the Respondent and have carried out in-depth investigation. However, after going through the DGAP’s investigation report, its annexures & calculations, the Respondent’s submissions and the other facts on […]
Sh. Vinod E Vs Bollineni Developers Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged that the Respondent Bollineni Developers Ltd. had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of the Flat No. J 703, 7th floor purchased from the Respondent in his project ‘Bollineni Silas’, situated at Sadarmangala, K […]
Smt. Renu Mittal w/o Mool Chand Mittal Vs Anant Raj Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the Report are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed application before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and submitted that she had purchased flat in the Respondent No. l’s Project […]
Sh. Deepak Garg Vs JKG Construction Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The present Report dated 31.08.2021 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the […]
Janki Prasad Pandey Vs Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board (NAA) The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 16.12.2020 under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant […]
