Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering Vs M/s Velbon Vitrified Tiles Pvt. Ltd (NAA) As seen from the invoices given above at para 4 it is clear that the base price of the product per box was Rs. 232.50 prior to 15.11.2017 and had remained the same even after GST rate reduction w.e.f. 15.11.2017. Therefore, […]
Shri Ashok Khatri Vs M/s S3 Infra Reality Pvt Ltd (NAA) From the documents placed on record and the DGAP’s report it is evident that the Respondent has sold 780 units out of 816 residential units, out of which for 29 units there was no consideration paid after introduction of GST, hence the profiteered amount […]
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Pvt Ltd Vs Shivam Water Treaters Pvt Ltd (National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai) The Resolution professional has also reported that Mr Gaurav Dave abused the RP while she was discharging her duties as Court officer. Such actions of the Ex-directors can never be tolerated. We at this moment provide two days […]
Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering Vs M/s Sudarsans (NAA) DGAP has submitted in his report that the rate of tax on the product (Jockey Socks 7052 FS ASSTD) remained same in the pre-GST and the post- GST era. Moreover, the pre-GST and post-GST base prices (excluding tax) had remained the same. Therefore, the provisions […]
Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering Vs M/s Emke Silks & Garments Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is clear from the perusal of the facts of the case that the product i.e. Shirts (Design 689) was exempted from the Central Excise Duty, vide Notification No. 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 and only attracted VAT @ 5%. After […]
DGAP has submitted in its report that the rate of tax on the product Trousers (Denim Jeans Design 899) had remained the same in the pre-GST and the post- GST era. Moreover, the pre-GST and post-GST base prices (excluding tax) had also remained the same. Therefore, the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have not been contravened and the allegation of profiteering by the Respondent was not established.
Director General Anti-Profiteering Vs M/s Pulimoottill Silks (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is clear from the perusal of the facts of the case that there was no reduction in the rate of tax on the Little Star Dhoti 406 (HSN 52081110) w.e.f. 01.07.2017, hence the anti-profiteering provisions contained in Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, […]
Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering Vs M/s Sudarsans (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) There was no reduction in the rate of tax on the (Jockey Shorts US 56 M ASSTD) w.e.f. 01.07.2017, hence the anti-profiteering provisions contained in Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 are not attracted. Hence, we do not find any merit […]
Sh. Kiran Chimirala & Director General Anti-Profiteering Vs. M/s. Jubilant Food Work Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) passed the order on an email complaint filed by a customer that Jubilant FoodWorks had not reduced the prices of ‘Dominos Stuffed Garlic Bread’ and ‘Medium Veg Pizza’ despite a cut in GST rate […]
Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering Vs M/s. S. J Spices Ltd (NAA) It is clear from the perusal of the facts of the case that there was no reduction in the rate of tax on the Black Pepper”(HSN code 09041140) w.e.f. 01.07.2017 and hence we find that there is no contravention of the anti-profiteering […]
