Parveen Kumar Bansal Vs Sternal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Authority finds and determines that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 42,21,321/- for the project `Signum 36′ during the period of investigation i.e. 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2019. The above amount that has been profiteered by the Respondent from his shop buyers/ recipients of supply […]
Sh. Ritesh Kumar Khandelwal Vs Forever Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Authority finds that the allotment of units, agreements, booking, construction activity and receipt of payments had taken place in the post-GST era. The draw of lots for allotment of houses was conducted on 05.07.2017 in the presence of the committee constituted under the Affordable Housing […]
Niranjan Swain Vs LIC HFL Care Homes Ltd. (NAA) Authority finds that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 1,85,70,263/- during the period of investigation i.e. 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2020. This amount of Rs. 1,85,70,263/- includes the amount relating to the Applicant No. 1 amounting to Rs. 1,27,892/-. The above amount that has been […]
Santosh Vs Miraj Entertainment Limited (NAA) The rates of GST on Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket was above one hundred rupee was reduced from 28% to 18% and Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket […]
Smt. Naina Rani Vs Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) It has been revealed that the Respondent was given benefit of ITC on the supply of Construction Services after the implementation of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017 and the Respondent was required to pass on such benefit of ITC to the homebuyers/shop buyers by way of commensurate reduction […]
Jotbir Singh Bhalla Vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Authority determines that the Respondent has profiteered an amount of Rs. 2,62,56,652/-. Therefore, given the above facts, the Authority under Rule 133(3)(a) of the CGST Rules orders that the Respondent shall reduce the price to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the […]
Sh. Priyanshu Pathak Vs Forever Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority finds that all the events i.e. the Licences, RERA Certificate, booking, the draw, allotment of flats, BBA, construction activity and receipt of payments has taken place in the post-GST era. It is also clear that the Applicant No. 1 was allotted flat only after […]
Launching of the project, Agreement to sell and Completion Certificate of the project had taken place in the pre-GST regime and hence, there was no post-GST tax rate or ITC structure which could be compared with the pre-GST tax rate and ITC and also the anti-profiteering provisions related to Section 171 were not in existence at that time.
Principal Commissioner Vs Sri Laxmi Kala Mandir 70MM Theatre (NAA) It is clear from the investigation carried out by the DGAP and also letter dated 03.06.2019 to Deputy Commissioner (Anti Evasion), Medchal, Hyderabad that the Respondent has maintained the same prices of all three categories of movie admission tickets which he was charging before the […]
Jigar R. Shah Vs Jay Ambe Developers (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is clear from the plain reading of Section 171(1) that, it deals with two situations:- one relating to the passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax and the second pertaining to the passing on the benefit of the ITC. On […]
