Read the full text of the ex-parte order issued by ITAT Mumbai in the case of Smt. Dakuben Saremalji Sancheti Nadol Charitable Trust vs National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC). The order reinstates the appeal to CIT(A) for assessment year 2020-21, considering Covid and software issues.
ITAT Mumbai declares that National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) cannot adjudicate appeals already disposed of by CIT(A). This landmark ruling also directed the Department to bear the litigation cost. Read our analysis here.
ITAT Mumbai held that the disclosure made by the tax auditor in audit report in Form 3CD about the ‘Details of contributions received from employees for various funds as referred to in section 36(1)(va)’ would now become indicative of a disallowance, hence provisions of section 143(1)(a)(iv) of the Act would get attracted.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition unsustainable as assessee has proved the three ingredients engraved in section 68 of the Act and proved the satisfactory nature of the loan transactions. On the otherhand, AO has not brought any contrary material to show that loan received is bogus or accommodation entries.
ITAT Mumbai’s decision in case of DCIT vs KEC International Limited, where a 0.6% arm’s length rate was established for corporate guarantee fees, influencing future transfer pricing adjustments.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that membership fees paid for a key person of a company are allowable as business expenditure. The case involved the disallowance of club membership fees paid to Cricket Club of India.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that the interest subsidy received under the technology upgradation fund scheme is considered a capital receipt, even if it is credited against interest expenditure in the books of account.
Ignorance of tax obligations on income earned from a partnership doesn’t excuse late filing of Income Tax Returns. ITAT Mumbai upholds Section 271F penalty in a recent case involving an advocate and his late ITR filing.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as the assessee being non-resident, income has been invested in India and not arisen in India.
ITAT Mumbai held that the employer has to remit both the contributions (employee’s contribution and employer’s contribution) to the Provident Fund within 15 days from the close of the month for which the employees earned their salary i.e., Salary payable.
