Madras High Court held that Settlement Commission not authorized to rectify the order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act as power of rectification vested to Settlement Commission only with effect from 01.06.2011.
Madras High Court held that passing of order cancelling GST registration without considering the submitted proofs is unsustainable. Accordingly, revoked the cancellation order.
Madras High Court held that there cannot be any excuse for not filing the counter affidavits in time. Thus, Standing Counsel directed to be prompt in filing the counter affidavits and make themselves ready to argue the cases without seeking more adjournments.
Madras High Court permits Tirupathi Packaging to respond to GST demand with conditions, including a 10% payment of disputed tax amount.
Notices issued to the respective banks attaching the accounts of the assessee maintained with them was valid as assessee did not file returns on time under Rule 7 of the TNVAT Rules, 2007, or submit complete returns for the assessment years, therefore, the deemed assessment passed under Section 22(4) of the TNVAT Act should be considered as the first assessment and the limitation for reopening the Assessment under Section 27 of the TNVAT Act, 2006 would apply only six years thereafter.
Madras High Court held that initiation of recovery proceedings based on ex-parte order passed without considering the submissions is unjustified. Accordingly, writ allowed and CIT(A) directed to dispose of appeal.
Madras High Court held that work contracts undertaken prior to 11.05.2002 cannot be brought under the purview of the tax net under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Accordingly, order set aside.
Madras High Court quashes GST show cause notice for one-day delay in GSTR-3B filing due to COVID-19. Extension recommended by GST Council considered key.
Madras High Court directs GST authorities to accept appeal challenging penalty after rejecting the claim that penalty alone cannot be contested.
Madras High Court sets aside GST order due to lack of physical service of notice and remands the case, directing the petitioner to deposit 10% of the disputed tax.
