The assessee is an individual, the respondent framed an assessment under the Act for the assessment year 1991-92 on the ground that the taxable gift exceeding Rs.12 lakhs has escaped assessment and therefore, notice under Section 16 of the Act was issued on 15.07.1992.
CIT to at least record a prima facie finding that certain amount claimed by assessee as deduction in its computation of income de facto related to earning of dividend income. Thus, it was held that in the absence of any such prima facie finding, the reassessment was erroneous and no addition could be made under section 14A.
The onus to prove the identity, the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction was solely on assessee under section 68 and merely because statutory approvals had been obtained by assessee, viz., FIPB and RBI did not sanctify the transaction especially when according to AO they were all unexplained investment.
DCIT Vs Salem Sree Ramavilas Chit Company Private Limited (Madras High Court) The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) has filed the current appeal against Order W.P.No.1732 of 2020. dated February 04, 2020 on the ground that the Appellant was not provided with a hearing opportunity and that the Hon’ble High Court of Madras made […]
CIT Vs Ayshwarya Sea Food Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court) on facts, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal held that the assessee had purchased shrimp products from a supplier at Nellore and the explanation given by them at the first instance before the Assessing Officer is that they are doing shrimp feed […]
Kuppan Gounder P.G.Natarajan Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (Madras High Court) Let us consider the scope of Section 6(2)(b) of the Act. It contemplates that “where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, […]
DCIT Vs Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Private Ltd. (Madras High Court) In the present case on hand, the appellants clearly stated the reason for reopening that particular fact has not been disclosed fully and truly in the assessment proceedings and so whether the assessee had disclosed it or not, can be decided by the authorities […]
CIT Vs Angels Educational Trust (Madras High Court) With regard to the observation of the appellant that only two of the Trustees were authorized to administer the Trust, the same was held to be not a reason to reject the case of the assessee-Trust and it is common that the day-to-day activities of a Trust […]
Tvl. Innovative Motors Vs The Goods and Service Tax Council (Madras High Court) This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents to reopen the GST Portal and to allow access to the portal to enable us to file Form GST TRAN – 1. Petitioner submit that denial of legitimate claim […]
CIT Vs Paul Devaraj (Madras High Court) Assessing Officer enhanced the turnover by comparing the packing material consumed by the assessee, which is incorrect and that there is an arithmetical error in the calculation done by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer considered the secondary packing material as packing material consumed for the purpose of […]
