In a recent ruling, the Karnataka HC held that Notice and endorsement issued without waiting for expiry of the appeal period of three months is illegal and arbitrary and liable to be quashed.
Karnataka High Court held that demand of Goods and Services Tax (GST) under reverse charge mechanism from service receiver will lead to double taxation since entire tax already paid by service provider. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Karnataka High Court addresses ITC blocking under Rule 86A of CGST Rules, directing authorities to provide post-decisional hearing and follow due process.
Respondent was appointed in the kitchen of the petitioner, on acts of theft, misappropriation and fraud, articles of charges were issued. Notably, it is alleged that a Safal brand one litre oil sachet was found hidden on the tank bag of his two wheeler.
It is submitted that the specific request of the petitioner for furnishing the entirety of the statements made as also the seized material, has not been accepted in its entirety and only the portions of statements were made available which has prejudiced the petitioner.
Karnataka High Court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer since non-response to notice issued under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act by the petitioner was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause.
CESTAT exempts Nokia India from service tax on sponsoring Kolkata Knight Riders in IPL, ruling that IPL qualifies as a sports event under tax laws.
Karnataka HC orders fair hearing in property tax dispute, barring coercive actions against petitioner. Court emphasizes due process and rights in property cases.
Karnataka HC exempts advocates from service tax, remanding case for fresh consideration after finding procedural flaws in the demand order issued.
Karnataka HC directs the Income Tax Department to refund Rs.154 crore with interest to IBM India, as per the Supreme Court’s directive.
