Bestpay Solutions Private Limited Vs Razorpay Software Private Limited (Karnataka High Court) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:- “A. Pass An Order U/S 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 appointing a sole arbitrator as per agreement dated entered on dated: 18/11/2020 to the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, […]
Jinesh Associates Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka High Court) Proviso to Section 29(2) of Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act specifically observes that there shall be no cancellation of GST registration without giving an opportunity of being heard. Accordingly, during the course of proceedings relating to cancellation of registration, there is a statutory mandate […]
Held that invalidity of sanction is different from absence of sanction and the point is to be raised during the trial.
Held that as per the reply notice, the petitioner has waived the right to settle the dispute in an arbitration proceedings. Accordingly, if the right is once waived it cannot be allowed to be reclaimed.
Tafe Access Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax (Karnataka High Court) undisputed facts of the case are, GST3 has been paid for the Assessment year 2017-18 on January 30, 2020 and refund application has been filed on July 07, 2020. In Para 4.2 of the Circular dated September 25, 2021, Ministry of Finance has […]
Himanshu Gupta Vs Vs. Narayana Reddy (Karnataka High Court) In terms of Section 421 of the Cr.P.C., a fine can be recovered in a manner as depicted hereinabove. Therefore, non-payment of compensation ensues dire consequences. The scheme of the provision being thus, though no application is filed, the Court may grant interim compensation, but it […]
There may be chances of diversion that might have taken place due to human error and it cannot be definitely concluded that diversion was deliberate
Held that the restriction contained under Section 9(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 doesn’t apply once an application under Section 9(1) for interim measures has been entertained by the Court.
Held that circular no. 150/06/2021-GST dated 17.06.2021 clarifying that GST exemption is not available to annuity (deferred payments) received by the concessionaries towards construction of roads is contrary to notification no. 32/2017 and notification no. 33/2017 dated 13.10.2017.
Date for the purpose of quantifying the stamp duty payable on the instrument is the date on which the instrument was signed
