Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : B M Habitat Vs Commissioner (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
B M Habitat Vs Commissioner (Karnataka High Court) Demand of Property Tax was unjustified before issuance of Occupancy Certificate as it was on completed/constructed building not on vacant land Conclusion: Demand of property tax was unjustified as the use of the property having commenced only post the occupancy certificate having been issued, the property being used for the benefit of assessee only thereafter it was only then that the building would become eligible for tax since the application of the property tax was on the building once completed and until then the incidence of property tax ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930