Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Unjustified Property Tax Demand Pre-Occupancy Certificate: Applied to Completed Building, Not Vacant Land

Case Law Details

Case Name
B M Habitat Vs Commissioner (Karnataka High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement B M Habitat Vs Commissioner (Karnataka High Court) Demand of Property Tax was unjustified before issuance of Occupancy Certificate as it was on completed/constructed building not on vacant land Conclusion: Demand of property tax was unjustified as the use of the property having commenced only post the occupancy certificate having been issued, the property being used for the benefit of assessee only thereafter it was only then that the building would become eligible for tax since the application of the property tax was on the building once completed and until then the incidence...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *