ITAT Visakhapatnam held that contributions received for charitable purpose cannot be treated as income u/s 2(24)(iia) of the Act and hence, the provision of section 2(15) do not apply to the corpus fund donations of a charitable institution.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that mere estimate of cost by Departmental Valuer could not constitute material to concealment and therefore levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is not valid.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the requirement of both the issuance and service of such notice upon the assessee for the purposes of Section 147 and 148 of the Act are mandatory jurisdictional requirements. Order passed is liable to be quashed on account of non-service of notice u/s 147/148.
Foreign Tax Credit allowable as assessee filed return of income & statement in Form-67 within due dates as extended by Finance Ministry
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the export entitlements is an income assessable under the head profits or gains from business or profession as per clause (iiib) and (iiid) to section 28 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that rent received from sub-letting the property is taxable under the head ‘income from other sources’ and not under the head ‘income from house property’.
3F Industries Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) The ALP is to be determined on an international transaction ie., on the international loan and not for the domestic loan. Therefore, the comparable in respect of foreign currency loan in international market is LIBOR based and which is internationally recognized and adopted. In the assessee’s own case […]
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that merely by converting the share application money by allotting shares at a subsequent date cannot attract the provisions of section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act 1961 as there is no change in the shareholding pattern subsequent to the allotment of shares by the subsidiary company.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that civil suit is filed before the Hon’ble District Judge accordingly the matter is squarely covered as exception as per proviso to section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the act and accordingly we hold that there is no case for invoking the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b).
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that liquidated damages are incidental business income but cannot be said to be profit from core or incidental activity. As there are not directly received from the core activity, they doesnt form part of computation in tonnage tax.
