Explore the case of Mahesh Gurram Vs ITO, where ITAT Vishakhapatnam dismisses the appeal as time barred due to insufficient cause for delay. Read the detailed analysis here.
Vizag ITAT ruled that CIT(A) order without remand report is invalid in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Exe) Vs. Keshava Reddy Educational Society case.
Learn about the tax dispute between Diamond Manufacturing Management and the Indian Revenue Authority, involving fees for technical collaboration and the absence of Permanent Establishment.
ITAT Visakhapatnam has held that if working capital adjustment on ALP has been already factored in pricing/ profitability vis-à-vis that of its comparables, then, no separate upward adjustment on outstanding receivables is required.
Read the detailed analysis of Vijapurapu Sudha Rao vs ITO case by ITAT Visakhapatnam. No penalty under section 271D for cash sale if promptly deposited in the bank.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that cooperative society is eligible for deduction U/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act on the interest income received from investment in banks.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that addition towards unexplained labour credits sustained as assessee failed to discharge the onus casted on it and failed to produce material evidence with respect to labour payments and material payments.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that capital gain taxable in the year in which possession of land is granted to the developer vide the original development agreement and not in the year in which supplementary agreement is entered.
ITAT Visakhapatnam in case of Vishnu Srinivasa Rao Kakarla Vs ITO clarifies that AO cannot travel beyond his jurisdiction to verify cash withdrawals when limited scrutiny was for verifying cash deposits.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that penalty u/s 271B of the Income Tax Act not imposable as provision of section 44AB of the Income Tax Act doesn’t apply to income that is treated as income from other sources.
