Explore the ITAT Indore’s order on unexplained investment and undisclosed expenditure. Assess the impact of legal nuances on tax implications.
Krishna Mohan Choursiya Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) We find that there is a clear distinction between a municipality and a gram panchayat as also enunciated in the judgment of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT v. P.J. Thomas as reported in [1995] 211 ITR 897 (MAD.), therefore, we are of the view […]
Held that search was carried out before the amendment, the addition ought to have been made in terms of the prevailing provision. Therefore, the addition made by the AO invoking Section 115BBE provision of which came into force only on 01.04.2017 is not sustainable.
Mushtak Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) We observe that the assessee is into this business as stamp vendor since last many years and Appeal is against disallowance of commission expenditure claimed by the assessee to have been paid to various customers/registry consultants purchasing the stamp papers. Now as far as the expenditure for commission of […]
We are compelled to hold that the benefit received by the assessee in the form of bigger size of flat and amount received as hardship allowance from the developer is a capital receipt, which cannot be treated as revenue receipt for taxing as income.
Smt. Manorama Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Indore bench has held that the denial of opportunity to the assessee to conduct cross-examination of the parties who have stated to have received ‘on money from the sale of land would amount to a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal […]
Kamal Kishore Mukati Vs PCIT (ITAT Indore) The facts in brief are that the assessee entered into an agreement in March 2006 for sale of agricultural land used for agricultural purpose. He received sale consideration in parts through banking channels. Sale deed was finally registered between March 2006 and April 2008. Before registering the sale […]
Alankar Jewelers Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore) The CBDT vide its circular F.No. 286/2/2003-IT (Inv.) dated 10th March 2003 has issued an advisory to its field officer regarding confession of additional income during the course of search and survey operations. Relevant portion of the above said circular is reproduced hereunder: “Instances have come to the notice […]
In search assessment, any undisclosed income, which can ultimately be added, is only to the extent of any unrecorded assets/material found or any incriminating documents found as representing undisclosed income earned, since, AO had not made any specific reference to the incriminating material found during the search in respect of additions made by him, therefore, assessment so framed, was bad in law.
ACIT Vs Sunderdeep Construction Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Indore) On perusal of the finding of Ld. CIT(A) as well as the facts narrated before us along with the documentary evidences it is predominantly clear that the alleged amount of bogus creditors are not in the form of sundry creditors. These amounts are advances against booking of […]
