DCIT Vs Rakesh Kumar Agrawal (ITAT Indore) The appellant also agitated the making of the addition on the legal ground that since as per the AO’s own version, during the course of the assessment proceedings, the appellant had not produced any books of account and therefore, the question of finding any credit entry as regard […]
Shri Yogesh Jhingan Vs DCIT (Central) (ITAT Indore) Since the addition in the instant appeal crops out of the issue referred above pertaining to A.Y. 2008-09, we will have to examine the correctness of the claim made by the assessee u/s 54F of the Act for A.Y. 2008-09. As far as sale of land is […]
DCIT Vs Sanverwala Jewellers Pvt Ltd (ITAT Indore) In this case Assessing Officer merely doubted the investment made by the share applicants for the reason that they did not submit any proof regarding agricultural activities done by them. It is therefore quite evident that the Assessing Officer himself accepted the identity of the share applicants […]
Ajit Lalwani Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Indore) In the instant of two appeals assessee has challenged the levy of penalty u/s 271CA of the Act for the violation of provisions of section 206C of the Act. We find that the assessee has furnished copy of form 27BA along with copy of Income Tax return of […]
Explore the ITAT Indore’s order on unexplained investment and undisclosed expenditure. Assess the impact of legal nuances on tax implications.
Krishna Mohan Choursiya Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) We find that there is a clear distinction between a municipality and a gram panchayat as also enunciated in the judgment of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT v. P.J. Thomas as reported in [1995] 211 ITR 897 (MAD.), therefore, we are of the view […]
Held that search was carried out before the amendment, the addition ought to have been made in terms of the prevailing provision. Therefore, the addition made by the AO invoking Section 115BBE provision of which came into force only on 01.04.2017 is not sustainable.
Mushtak Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) We observe that the assessee is into this business as stamp vendor since last many years and Appeal is against disallowance of commission expenditure claimed by the assessee to have been paid to various customers/registry consultants purchasing the stamp papers. Now as far as the expenditure for commission of […]
We are compelled to hold that the benefit received by the assessee in the form of bigger size of flat and amount received as hardship allowance from the developer is a capital receipt, which cannot be treated as revenue receipt for taxing as income.
Smt. Manorama Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Indore bench has held that the denial of opportunity to the assessee to conduct cross-examination of the parties who have stated to have received ‘on money from the sale of land would amount to a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal […]
