Held that the explanation of the source of these very small loans as given by friends of the assessee to help him in his share trading transactions, and which has been confirmed by two parties, cannot be dismissed as unbelievable.
Held that merely because the assessee is referred as a contractor in the agreement, it doesn’t detract the assessee from the position of being a developer, nor will deprive the assessee from claiming deduction under Section 80IA(4) of the Act.
Shri Mohanlal Savjibhai Tilva Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) The case of the assessee was that the loan in cash was taken from his HUF on account of extreme business exigency and necessity of honouring post dated cheques issued to the third parties. Further at that time, the assessee was not having sufficient balance in the […]
Held that AO correctly estimated the income of the assessee at 1% of the total transactions of cricket betting as found recorded in the laptops seized
Ahmedabad ITAT dismisses Ambica Trust’s appeal as it failed to electronically file Form 10B for exemptions under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act.
Issue relating to the land vacation compensation charges claimed by the assessee in the year under consideration was duly examined by the Assessing Officer by making the necessary inquiries and after satisfying himself on perusal of the relevant details and documents placed on record by the assessee
Held that the addition made on account of excess depreciation claimed, having been surrendered by the assessee itself without any prior detection by the Revenue, the excess claim having been demonstrated to have been made for bonafide reasons, it is surely not a case for levy of penalty at all.
Held that the expenditure incurred on mere registration of trade-mark is a revenue expenditure
DCIT Vs Vinod Chimanlal Modi (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is observed that sufficient documentary evidence was placed on record by the assessee before the learned CIT(A) to establish that M/s. S.S. Enterprises is a proprietary concern of M/s. Gunesh India Pvt. Ltd. and on the basis of the same, a finding was recorded by the leaned […]
ITO Vs Jitendra Shanabhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) observed that there was no large number of purchase and sale of land by the assessee. In fact, the acquisition of agricultural land owned by the assessee was done by the Government and thus Section 10(37) of the Act are attracted. As regards consideration of the rural […]
