Explore critical judgment of ITAT Hyderabad in DCIT Vs Vessella Constructions concerning revenue recognition and sale of villas. Gain in-depth insights.
ITAT Hyderabad held that condonation of delay in filing of an appeal not granted as the assessee miserably failed to prove her case for a reasonable cause not to file the appeals in time.
Analysis of ITAT Hyderabad’s decision in Mareddy Jagan Mohan Vs ITO: Cost levied for ignoring CIT(A) NFAC notices and impact on the assessee’s appeal.
ITAT Hyderabad rules on Rotodyne Engineering’s appeal, emphasizing the impact of the COVID pandemic on document submission for tax assessments.
ITAT Hyderabad recognizes the relevance of DCB reports in determining proper payment of CST and VAT by Sri Gurukrupa Agro Industries for 2015-16.
ITAT Hyderabad held that law doesn’t permit delegation of authority by PCIT to Assessing Officer (AO) for the purpose of imposition of penalty. Accordingly, direction issued by PCIT to AO to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is unlawful.
ITAT Hyderabad held that Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was the most appropriate method in the absence of a Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) which is applicable to the payment of technical service fee which is in nature of intangibles.
SAP Medicals Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO: Appeal against ITAT’s 263 ruling. Explore demonetization cash deposit issue, legal analysis, and dismissal grounds.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Hyderabad ruled in favor of Rajiv Venkataraman, stating that the survival benefit received from LIC on his father’s death is exempt under Section 10(10D) of the Income Tax Act.
In the case of Sandeep Auraneebadkar vs. ITO, the ITAT Hyderabad partially deleted an addition made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act due to failure to explain credit card payments with supporting evidence.
