Read an in-depth analysis of the Ishoo Narang Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) case. The ITAT upheld a penalty levied due to non-compliance with a notice under section 271 of the Income Tax Act.
The ITAT Hyderabad recently ruled in favor of NCC Infrastructure Holdings Limited, declaring no disallowance of deduction under section 14A of the Income Tax Act can be made if the assessee hasn’t earned any exempt income.
Held that an amount of foreign assignment allowance received for the services rendered outside India by way of (Travel Currency Card) TCC abroad is not taxable in India.
ITAT Hyderabad held that waiver of the principal amount, which was taken for trading purpose, which is credited to the profit & loss account results in income in the hands of assessee and accordingly taxable.
In a recent case, the ITAT Hyderabad held that the provisions of section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act are not applicable when the source of income is disclosed.
ITAT Hyderabad’s decision on Shridhar Madhav Diwan vs DCIT case emphasizes re-examination of denied foreign tax credit due to late Form No. 67, aligning with DTAA provisions and Income Tax Rules.
ITAT Hyderabad order, wherein Mohammed Rahimuddin successfully appeals the penalty u/s 271A due to estimation-based income addition.
In Pavuluri Sylendra Nellore Vs ITO case, ITAT Hyderabad confirms addition under section 69C due to unexplained source of credit card payment.
Delhi High Court has directed readjudication in the case of Praveen Bansal Vs ITO, stating that the assessment order under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act is not valid if the escaped income is below Rs. 50 lakhs.
ITAT Hyderabad case Narasimha Rao Venkata Lakshmi Nandury Vs ITO, emphasizing that a meritorious case should not be dismissed when proper documents are produced
