Gujarat High Court held that looking at the kind of quantum of gold smuggled in India, it is impossible to accept that petitioner has no financial capacity. Accordingly, pre-deposit mandatory under section 129E of the Customs Act for further proceedings.
Shree Siddhi Foods Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) In this case request of adjournment for seven days was not acceded to by explicit order. Thereafter, when the order was passed under Section 148A(d) on 31.3.2022, he was oblivious of the reply which was tendered by the petitioner-assessee. This practice of not responding to the request […]
Gujarat High court held that the dues in the nature of sales tax or VAT payable by the original owner cannot claim priority over the dues of the secured creditor.
Held that, assessment proceedings suffer from serious procedural errors in absence of a proper SCN, where there were serious discrepancies in the proceedings. Thus, entire proceedings are vitiated.
HC quashed and set aside SCN and consequential GST registration cancellation order on ground of violation of principles of natural justice as no reasonable opportunity of hearing was given to assessee.
Gujarat High Court held that detachable warrants have conceivable cost of acquisition and the same is deductible from sale consideration for calculation of capital gain.
The petitioner was engaged in the business of trading in coal. The department issued summons for recording of statement and production of sales and purchase registers. The director of petitioner was unable to attend and requested for adjournment.
Vinod Fabrics Private Limited Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) Gujarat High Court quashes Section 148 notice along with order under section 148A(d) for AY 2014-15, Post SC decision in UOI vs. Ashish Agrawal FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT 1. The petitioner seeks to challenge the notice issued under Section-148 of the […]
Taru Pallav Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) Hon. Gujarat High Court quashes Section 148 notice along with order under section 148A(d) for AY 2013-14, Post SC decision in UOI vs. Ashish Agrawal 1. The petitioner seeks to challenge the notice issued under Section-148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.06.2021. In […]
Most of my judgements are getting sufficient views. Surely sometimes the analysis may turn out to be not satisfying However addressing the same with a tag that allocation of judgement will be stopped doesnt sound professional
