Naresh Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) When the grounds for reopening the reassessment do not exist any longer and no additions were ultimately made on that account, the addition in respect of the other items, which were not part of the ‘ reasons to believe’cannot be made. ITAT states that it is evident that […]
Shri Sanjay Kaul Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Whether the transaction carried out by the assessee and the claim of the short Term Capital Loss is in the normal course of the investment activity of the assessee. We find that the Assessing Officer has referred to investigation done by the Directorate of Investigation, Kolkata, to highlight the […]
The issue under consideration is whether addition made on account of Advertisement, Marketing, and Sales Promotion (AMP) transactions is justified in law?
Delhi Police Education Fund Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee argued that the assessee is involved in promoting the post Higher Secondary Education and fulfils the test of Section 2(15) of the Act, the definition of charitable purpose. Ld. DR argued that the assessee’s activities are limited to the wards of the Police personnel. Hence, it […]
Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (India) Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that It is true that the assessee has paid rebate/discount to its overseas AEs. It is equally true that such arrangement has been done through Master Service Agreements (‘MSA’) with various overseas companies (sample JC Penny ) for providing testing and […]
Chowdry Associates Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) From the entirety of the events, we find that in the assessment year 2014-15, the assessee had made purchases in the middle or last week of June 2013 through M/s Anand Rathi Commodities Ltd. and M/s Philips Commodities Pvt. Ltd. The NSEL failed to fulfill its commitments and ultimately […]
Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether expenditure on account of civil and interior works liable for depreciation at 10% or at 15%? ITAT states that, they have perused the items of the expenditure which has been reproduced by the assessing officer in the assessment order and […]
The issue under consideration is whether the assessment order passed by the assessing officer under section 153C is bad in law and void ab-initio?
whether disallowance of the expenses only on the basis that there was reduction in the sharing of the revenue in comparison to the earlier years is justified in law?
Whether upward adjustment to book profit under section 115JB of the Act, by treating the loss on purchase and redemption of mutual funds as expenditure relatable to earning exempt income is justified in law?
